During the Song Dynasty, there was a mandarin from a certain province named Dien Dang, because his name harmonized with the word “dang” (lamp), for envy, he did not allow the people next to him to talk about any word. which harmonizes with the word “post”. If anyone commits a cavalry offense, the light will be beaten with a staff, and the heavy one will be punished. Those who are not careful enough to commit taboos are innumerable. In order to be jealous, the people in the whole continent had to call “dang” (light) to “fire” (fire), “point of light” (lighting a lamp) said to be “point of fire” (to light a fire).

Watching: What is Double Standard

One year, the Lunar New Year is coming. The mandarin’s office lights the lamps, the folk go to see the lights, reward the lights has become a custom that everyone knows. So the mandarin office the day before yesterday posted a notice for the public to know. At that time, people working in the government office felt extremely headache, no matter what, the word “post” on the notice could not be avoided. After thinking about it, he decided, as usual, to change the word “dang” to the word “fire”. Bach in the whole city read the following statement “for the sake of the next life”, in the Nguyen Tieu New Year: Ban Chau y li, set fire to the three suns.

When the announcement appeared, the people there did not understand, let alone people from other places, the monk Truong Nhi scratched his head even more, thinking that the government was going to set fire to 3 days!

When everyone finally understood the original source, everyone laughed. People not only criticized Dien Dang as the “fire man” but also angrily said:

– What morality is that? Only for Chau Quan to be set on fire, not for people to post points! That is the background of the proverb “only promises to burn the coffin, not promises to calculate the point of posting.” And also a great example of a double standard.

A “double standard” is the application of different principles and ways of dealing with the same problem or situation. It is seen as a kind of prejudice and morally unfair if it follows the principle that all men are born equal and free, which is also the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence that Uncle Ho wrote. .

READ MORE  How's the Fate of People Born in 2019?

Vietnam’s Declaration of Independence

Double standards are viewed as absurd because they strongly violate the basic maxim of modern jurisprudence: all men are equal before the law. It violates all the principles of justice commonly known as equity which tries to set a common standard for all things without bias whether by class, social status, gender, religion , politics, age…”.

Double standard example

Going back to the story about the mandarin above, it sounds unfair, right, but it’s not. In fact, it is very fair and is an important feature for society to function. People with important jobs, contributing more to society, of course must enjoy more privileges than ordinary people. Social justice can only be found in books. A society without competition to reach a ladder of power/money will never thrive. Everyone understands that when they have these things in hand, they will enjoy more privileges than ordinary people.

Like we use words. Work must be “reasonable and reasonable”. See it? The word “love” always precedes the word “li”. The arguments here can be seen as framing principles. Legal example. The word “love” is a situation to aggravating or mitigating the reward/punishment. For example: status, money.

A child from a poor family who studies well will be awarded the title of “poor student overcoming difficulties”. But a rich kid who studies well is considered normal by everyone. It’s a double standard. Think fast, do you support this and take it for granted?

Many will resist and say it’s unfair. But in my opinion, that’s normal. The strength of human intelligence is flexibility, solving the same problem but in two different directions to bring the best results. It’s also the bottleneck that keeps AI from ever surpassing humans, at least for now.

See also: What is Box Office – Meaning of the word Box Office

In many cases, judges did the right thing in their ability and responsibility but still had to re-trial to meet pressure from public opinion. That’s a bad “double standard”. Vigorously trampled on “rule of law” and set a bad precedent. Like the suicide retrial, a few days later, I read the news of suicide threats after the trial

In short: Double standards in social life help people to be smarter and make more rational decisions. However, when applied to the law. It is extremely dangerous and should be avoided. What a lawyer like me always thinks about ;))))))

READ MORE  Meaning Of The Word Live

During the Song Dynasty, there was a mandarin from a certain province named Dien Dang, because his name harmonized with the word “dang” (lamp), for envy, he did not allow the people next to him to talk about any word. which harmonizes with the word “post”. If anyone commits a cavalry offense, the light will be beaten with a staff, and the heavy one will be punished. Those who are not careful enough to commit taboos are innumerable. In order to be jealous, the people in the whole continent had to call “dang” (lamp) to “fire” (fire), “point”. sign” (light a lamp) said to be “fire point” (light on fire).

One year, the Lunar New Year is coming. The mandarin’s office lights the lamps, the folk go to see the lights, reward the lights has become a custom that everyone knows. So the mandarin office the day before yesterday posted a notice for the public to know. At that time, people working in the government office felt extremely headache, no matter what, the word “post” on the notice could not be avoided. After thinking about it, he decided, as usual, to change the word “dang” to the word “fire”. Bach in the whole city read the following statement “for the sake of the next life”, in the Nguyen Tieu New Year: Ban Chau y li, set fire to the three suns.

When the announcement appeared, the people there did not understand, let alone people from other places, the monk Truong Nhi scratched his head even more, thinking that the government was going to set fire to 3 days!

When everyone finally understood the original source, everyone laughed. People not only criticized Dien Dang as the “fire man” but also angrily said:

– What morality is that? Only for Chau Quan to be set on fire, not for people to post points! That is the background of the proverb “only promises to burn the coffin, not promises to calculate the point of posting.” And also a great example of a double standard.

A “double standard” is the application of different principles and ways of dealing with the same problem or situation. It is seen as a kind of prejudice and morally unfair if it follows the principle that all men are born equal and free, which is also the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence that Uncle Ho wrote. .

READ MORE  How To Use Regedit With Pictures

Vietnam’s Declaration of Independence

Double standards are viewed as absurd because they strongly violate the basic maxim of modern jurisprudence: all men are equal before the law. It violates all the principles of justice commonly known as equity which tries to set a common standard for all things without bias whether by class, social status, gender, religion , politics, age…”.

Going back to the story about the mandarin above, it sounds unfair, right, but it’s not. In fact, it is very fair and is an important feature for society to function. People with important jobs, contributing more to society, of course must enjoy more privileges than ordinary people. Social justice can only be found in books. A society without competition to reach a ladder of power/money will never thrive. Everyone understands that when they have these things in hand, they will enjoy more privileges than ordinary people.

Like we use words. Work must be “reasonable and reasonable”. See it? The word “love” always precedes the word “li”. The arguments here can be seen as framing principles. Legal example. The word “love” is a situation to aggravating or mitigating the reward/punishment. For example: status, money.

See also: What is Lgbtq+ – General term Lgbtq+

A child from a poor family who studies well will be awarded the title of “poor student overcoming difficulties”. But a rich kid who studies well is considered normal by everyone. It’s a double standard. Think fast, do you support this and take it for granted?

Many will resist and say it’s unfair. But in my opinion, that’s normal. The strength of human intelligence is flexibility, solving the same problem but in two different directions to bring the best results. It’s also the bottleneck that keeps AI from ever surpassing humans, at least for now.

In many cases, judges did the right thing in their ability and responsibility but still had to re-trial to meet pressure from public opinion. That’s a bad “double standard”. Vigorously trampled on “rule of law” and set a bad precedent. Like the suicide retrial, a few days later, I read the news of suicide threats after the trial

In short: Double standards in social life help people to be smarter and make more rational decisions. However, when applied to the law. It is extremely dangerous and should be avoided. What a lawyer like me always thinks about ;))))))